Diversity in Utility Regulation

          Last month’s essay, “Promoting Diversity and Prohibiting Discrimination: Is There a Regulatory Obligation to Society?,” addressed the Supreme Court’s 1976 decision in National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Federal Power Commission. The Court held that the Commission had no power to issue a rule banning racial discrimination. The reason: While certainly consistent with the general “public interest,” such a rule lay outside the Federal Power Act’s purpose, which was the electric industry’s economic performance.

          The essay accepted the premise that utility regulation is about economic performance, but argued that diversity in a utility’s board, executive suite, managerial ranks and employee base is relevant to a utility’s performance. A utility that looks like the community it serves will better serve that community. That premise supports, indeed requires, that regulators make diversity a priority. Regrettably, since that essay came out 10 years ago, few state commissions have taken the necessary actions. Maybe recent events can make a difference.

          The essay received commentary from five committed, thoughtful people: Steven Weissman, Jeffrey Ackermann, David Yaffe, Jason Zeller and Cynthia Chaplin. Their submissions follow.

 

Steve Weissman, Lecturer, Univ. of Calif. Berkeley Goldman School of Public Policy; Former ALJ and Commission Advisor, Calif. PUC

          The NAACP case provides an invitation for regulators to think more expansively about how utility processes and behavior have an impact on ratepayers’ interest in safe, reliable, and reasonably priced service.  For instance, a Commission could conclude that a utility with strong minority hiring practices will be better situated to provide the best service at the best price because: (1) a welcoming work environment improves employee morale which can enhance safety, reliability and economic efficiency, and  (2) active consideration of the full range of contractors (including minority contractors) enhances competition based on price and service quality. With these concepts in mind, regulators could conclude that utility rates and service cannot be just and reasonable without an active minority hiring program.

          Regardless of how wide of a lane was paved by the Court in NAACP, regulators have long moved beyond a blindered view of ratepayers’ interests to ensure that utilities are good corporate citizens. For instance, when Pacific Gas & Electric’s transformers started leaking carcinogenic chemicals. it wasn't just a matter of it responding by doing just what the law might require.  The utility was expected to spare no expense and clean up the mess, regardless of fault. Regulators have ordered utilities to convert their vehicle fleets to low- or no-carbon cars and trucks, even when this was not the cheapest alternative. Regulators, at least in California, have long erred on the side of supporting union labor by approving prevailing wage formulas for the labor component of the revenue requirement.  Perhaps some of the decisions in this spirit get by just because no one contests them, or no court elects to hear the case. But there also may be a tacit agreement that utility regulation is a broader expression of the collective values of the community. In providing services that are vested with a public interest, the utilities are expected to do the right thing. NAACP does not address this rationale, but it also does not get in the way.

Services

Testimony, Papers, and Presentations

Surrebuttal Testimony of Scott Hempling on Behalf of Baltimore Washington Construction and Public Employees Laborers' District Council in the matter of an Application of Potomac Electric Power Company for Authority to Implement a Formal Multiyear Rate Plan for Electric Distribution Service in the District of Columbia
Hempling testimony to D.C. PSC (Feb. 2020)
Direct testimony before the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin in the Joint Application of Wisconsin Electric Power Company and Wisconsin Gas LLC, for Authority to Adjust Electric, Natural Gas, and Steam Rates
A layperson’s introduction to regulation created by Scott Hempling in support of The British Columbia Utilities Commission's inquiry into whether utility regulation should extend to utilities owned by indigenous nations.
This tesimony relates to the modification of rates, charges, and tariffs for retail electric service in Oklahoma.

Books by Hempling

Regulating Public Utility Performance

“[A] comprehensive regulatory treatise …. In all respects, it merits comparison with Kahn and Phillips."

Regulating Public Utility Performance:  The Law of Market Structure, Pricing and Jurisdiction

Learn More and Order

Preside or Lead

Preside or Lead?
The Attributes and Actions of Effective Regulators

Now Available on Kindle

Learn More and Order

Hempling Appearances

Energy Bar Association
Panel on Practice Principles for New Regulatory Lawyers


UDC Law School Panel
Is the Exelon Takeover of Pepco in the Public Interest?


Nigeria Electricity Regulatory Commission
3rd Judges’ Seminar


Telecom Forum
Asamblea Plenaria REGULATEL


view ALL

Receive Essays

Electricity Jurisdiction

Testimonials

Working with Scott Hempling is both a pleasure and an honor. Ethical, fair-minded, and dedicated—these are a few of the attributes that Scott brings to his work and his clients. His pursuit of justice is to ensure that a practical outcome will ensue. Scott recognizes the significance of every issue and its implications for any person involved either directly or indirectly. His wide-angle lens encompasses a broad and deep technical legal knowledge that allows him to decipher and give insight into every challenge.
— Elise Herzig, President and CEO, Ontario Energy Association