Advice to Presidents and Governors
on Appointing Excellent Regulators

Your many duties include appointing and confirming economic regulators. In the utility sector, they are responsible for inducing high-quality performance by providers of electric, gas, water, and telecommunications service. Their decisions will affect millions of consumers; billions of investor dollars; the local, regional, and national economies; and our air, land, and water. Here are nine thoughts on producing top-notch results.

1. Appointments rooted in principle

“Regulation” is not a political whipping boy, something to campaign against. Nor is it a unidimensional spectrum on which “more” is better than “less.” Serious regulators do not debate oversimplifications like “command and control” versus “light-handed” regulation. (The regulatory legend Peter Bradford once noted, “I've heard of light-headed regulation, light-fingered regulation, and red-handed regulation; I know little of light-handed regulation.”) The purpose of regulation performance—aligning utilities' behavior with the public's needs. Principled regulators ask five questions: (1) What outcomes do we seek? (2) What behaviors, engaged in by whom, impede those outcomes? (3) What behaviors, engaged in by whom, achieve those outcomes? (4) To prevent the negatives and promote the positives, what actions must regulators take?

2. A multi-dimensional job

Utility regulation used to be straightforward. Utilities built infrastructure, sold products and services and proposed rate increases. Commissions approved projects and set rates. Their central aim was to protect customers from monopoly abuse—imprudent investments, inefficient operations, and undue discrimination against choiceless customers—while setting rates that gave investors a fair shot at a reasonable return.

Today's regulators do much more . . .

Services

Testimony, Papers, and Presentations

Testimony addresses the issues of whether the proposed transaction affects the interests of ratepayers; the ability of JCP&L and MAIT to provide safe, adequate, and proper utility service at just and reasonable rates; and whether the proposed transaction is in the public interest.
This expert report was submitted to a federal trial court in May 2016 on behalf of City of Jacksonville, Florida. The litigation, and report, involve a 1943 disaffiliation of a gas corporation from its holding company, as mandated by the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935. The report explains why the disaffiliation did not prevent liability for the costs of environmental cleanup, if such liability exists under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, from passing to the new corporation.

Now Available

Regulating Public Utility Performance

“[A] comprehensive regulatory treatise …. In all respects, it merits comparison with Kahn and Phillips."

Regulating Public Utility Performance:  The Law of Market Structure, Pricing and Jurisdiction

Learn More and Order

Preside or Lead

Preside or Lead?
The Attributes and Actions of Effective Regulators

Now Available on Kindle

Learn More and Order

Hempling Appearances

Energy Bar Association
Panel on Practice Principles for New Regulatory Lawyers


UDC Law School Panel
Is the Exelon Takeover of Pepco in the Public Interest?


Nigeria Electricity Regulatory Commission
3rd Judges’ Seminar


Telecom Forum
Asamblea Plenaria REGULATEL


view ALL

Receive Essays

Electricity Jurisdiction

Letter to Governors and Legislators

Testimonials

I highly recommend Scott Hempling. I have known him since 2003, since he was a consultant for the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission on various important and cutting-edge policy regulatory matters in Hawaii, through his time as the Executive Director at the National Regulatory Research Institute. His expertise, knowledge, and experience in all regulatory and energy matters is unmatched, and he would be a highly valuable resource and asset in any such endeavor.
— Carlito P. Caliboso, former Chairman, Hawaii Public Utilities Commission