“Prudence”: Who’s Minding the Store?

Excitement Causes Costs

Regulation has its equations: for the annual revenue requirement, for rate design, for cost of capital, for “grossing-up” taxes. Here’s another:

PE + PIO + URR + CC = CO,

where PE is policy excitement, PIO is private investment opportunity, URR is under-resourced regulators, and CC is captive customers. CO is, of course, cost overruns.

Also known as “taking risks with other people’s money,” the equation predicts accountability slippage and dollar disappointment when (1) policymakers want something badly; (2) private investment is eager to assist; (3) regulatory resources are unavailable, distracted, or overworked; and (4) someone is stuck with the bet. The equation works in both regulated and unregulated markets, where the “captives” are ratepayers and taxpayers, respectively.

There’s plenty of historical data to fit the equation: nuclear power in the 1970s, savings and loans in the 1980s, banking and housing in the aughts.

Are We at Risk Today?  Seven Possibilities

These historical examples have their current counterparts. Here are seven cost drivers and their advocates’ arguments:

Nuclear power:  “We need more baseload plants, coal is dirty, clean coal is speculative, and renewable is unreliable, while nuclear has learned from its mistakes.”

Transmission:  “We’ve starved transmission investment for two decades, the new renewable power sources are remote from loads, and baseload generation needs to reach growing population centers.”

Clean coal:  “Coal is America’s dominant resource, renewables cannot serve baseload demands, and nuclear remains technologically speculative, stuck in waste-storage disputes and dependent on taxpayers to cover catastrophes.”
Smart grid: “It will help utilities operate more efficiently and reliably while cutting carbon emissions, cause customers to consume less, improve utility planning, and grow jobs.”

Shale gas exploration:  “We can be the ‘Saudi Arabia of gas,’ cut our foreign energy dependence, and build a low-cost ‘bridge to the future,’ buying time for nuclear and clean coal.”

Broadband:  “It’s today’s equivalent of the U.S. mail: Our economy, educational future and our civic society require that everyone be connected, regardless of location and income.”

Water infrastructure:  “Our pipes and pumping stations are a half-century old, water treatment is becoming more complex, and our population is growing while our water supply is fixed. We need to fix our plumbing.”
Plenty of powerful interests, all pressing for approval of their prudence. Is regulation ready?

Does “Prudence” Get Sufficient Attention?  Seven Concerns

To prevent excess costs, we must insist on utility prudence. We have the legal tool: the “just and reasonable” standard. But there remain seven obstacles.

Unclear expectations:  “Just and reasonable” and “prudence” are only chapter headings. Commissions define “prudent” as “what a reasonable person would do.” What would a “reasonable person” do with a billion-dollar choice among nuclear, clean coal, transmission, and demand response? Courts have defined prudence circularly, as avoiding “unreasonable costs,” operating at “lowest feasible cost,” and “operat[ing] with all reasonable economies.” (See, respectively, General Telephone Co. of Upstate New York, Inc. v. Lundy, 17 N.Y.2d 373, 377, 218 N.E.2d 274, 277 (1966); Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Public Service Comm’n, 661 A.2d 131, 138 (D.C. App. 1995); and El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. FPC, 281 F.2d 567, 573 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 366 U.S. 912 (1960)). Regulatory expectations range from “tolerable” to “average” to “excellent.” Clarity is needed.

Intra-agency tension:  Legislatures want regulators to boost favored resources while also ensuring their prudence. That places regulators in a tough spot. An agency tasked by law to propel clean coal cannot easily couple support with skepticism. Two more examples: Federal Power Act Section 219 directs FERC to boost transmission with “incentives.” But prudence requires that any transmission solution beat the non-transmission alternatives. How does an agency judge that contest if it’s charged with boosting one of the contestants? Similarly, the FCC has declared broadband a national priority. Can it now risk discouraging investors by probing at the prudence of broadband plans?

This is not a new problem. The old Atomic Energy Commission had the dual role of advancing nuclear power while ensuring its safety. The resulting role tension caused Congress to separate the functions; the Nuclear Regulatory Commission now handles safety while the U.S. Department of Energy funds nuclear research. The Food and Drug Administration is pressed by the pharmaceutical industry to approve drugs rapidly, even as the public expects protection from unsafe products. The Department of Agriculture publishes dietary guidelines that advise against excess fat and calories, even as its mission includes advancing the health of beef and cheese producers.

Prudence proponents get marginalized:  When excitement and money surround a solution, supporters caricature prudence proponents as mission opponents, marginalizing them for having “other agendas.” Some prudence-insisters dig their own holes by actually having other agendas, like competing solutions—or by having no agenda, no alternative, no obligation to grapple and decide, just a habit of saying “no.” There is pressure to “go along.”

Asymmetry of expertise:  Assessing prudence requires deep knowledge of engineering and project costing. Absent internal expertise equal to the expertise of the planners and builders, a commission will hesitate to judge severely. It’s a question of humility. See two prior essays on the problem of resource differentials here and here.

Insufficient benchmarks:  We are betting billions on new things—new technology, new forms of financing, new expectations for customer behavior. Newness means the costs and benefits are unknown. Prudence review depends on comparisons, but with new products and few suppliers, and with custom design a constant feature, it is hard to comparison-shop.

Prudence review is no fun:  There is no good time to determine prudence. Pre-expenditure, we lack the perspective and facts needed to make binding decisions on cost caps or cost approvals. Commissions don’t like making ratepayers the risk-bearers of unknown outcomes. Post-expenditure, prudence disallowances hurt the utility, and they risk attacks on regulation itself—the clichés of “20-20 hindsight,” “Monday-morning quarterbacking” and “hostile regulatory environment.” Then there’s the “too big to fail” dilemma, where assigning the appropriate cost consequence could damage the only company we have. The temporal middle ground—continuous prudence decisions during the construction phase—has its own awkwardnesses, by drawing the commission into monthly project management decisions.

Rhetoric and ideology:  Regulation produces conflicting feelings. Americans like it when it protects, but oppose it when it obstructs. This dichotomy invites demonizing and demagogueing—from the oversimplifiers who accuse the regulatory advocates of “command and control” and the free-marketers of letting “markets run amok.” It is better to concede that for untested technologies, both markets and regulation have their weaknesses: A market is effectively competitive only if consumers have substitutes, but new technologies often lack substitutes; while regulation looks skeptically at the suboptimal outcomes that experiments inevitably produce.

Conclusion

Excitement has a cost, especially if prudence review is marginalized. How do we bring prudence back to the center?

Comments

Guest

Need help boosting your Instagram account? We can provide high quality fully automated Instagram services for you. All 100% safe! We can get you tons of Likes on each post you make, and send new Followers to your account each day. All on auto! We also have the best prices online! Get started now at: http://followlike.club

Guest

Hello, my name is Jim and I was just looking your website scotthemplinglaw.com over and thought I would message you on your contact form and offer some help. I really like your site but I noticed you weren’t getting a lot of traffic and your Alexa ranking isn’t as strong as it could be. https://TopTargetSEO.com Fortunately, I may have an answer for you. I can get you 1,000’s of visitors looking at scotthemplinglaw.com ready to buy your product, service or sign up for an offer and fast. Our advertising network of over 9000 websites provides a low cost and effective online marketing solutions that actually works. I can help your business get more online quality traffic by advertising your business on websites that are targeted to your specific market. The Internet is vast but you don’t have to spend huge amounts of cash to jump start your business. I can get you 10,000 highly targeted visitors directly to your website for as little as $39.00 for a 30 day trial run. https://TopTargetSEO.com It has taken us 12 years to perfect our system and in addition to being exciting, it works!! We also have a special offer of 200,000 Targeted visitors spread over 60 days for a special one time charge of $299.00. If you would like to talk personally and have specific questions, call me @ 480-331-6775 from 9am to 5pm MST. Also check out the short video here and see how everything works. Best Regards, Jim support [at] TopTargetSEO [dot] com TopTargetSEO.com https://toptargetseo.com.com

Guest

Hello, my name is Jim and I was just looking your website scotthemplinglaw.com over and thought I would message you on your contact form and offer some help. I really like your site but I noticed you weren’t getting a lot of traffic and your Alexa ranking isn’t as strong as it could be. https://besttrafficpros.com Fortunately, I may have an answer for you. I can get you 1,000’s of visitors looking at scotthemplinglaw.com ready to buy your product, service or sign up for an offer and fast. Our advertising network of over 9000 websites provides a low cost and effective online marketing solutions that actually works. I can help your business get more online quality traffic by advertising your business on websites that are targeted to your specific market. The Internet is vast but you don’t have to spend huge amounts of cash to jump start your business. I can get you 10,000 highly targeted visitors directly to your website for as little as $39.00 for a 30 day trial run. https://besttrafficpros.com It has taken us 12 years to perfect our system and in addition to being exciting, it works!! We also have a special offer of 200,000 Targeted visitors spread over 60 days for a special one time charge of $299.00. If you would like to talk personally and have specific questions, call me @ 480-331-6775 from 9am to 5pm MST. Also check out the short video here and see how everything works. Best Regards, James Douglas support [at] besttrafficpros [dot] com BestTrafficpros.com https://besttrafficpros.com

Guest

Hi, I was checking out some of your competitors sites for a client and thought I'd drop you a quick message that might help your site. I'm having great success with this... https://bestchoiceseo.com/social-media SocialMonkee is a proven link building service that already helps thousands build backlinks to their pages (Tier 1) as well as their existing backlinks (Tier 2). With SocialMonkee, not only can you easily build backlinks to your pages, but also boost your existing backlinks, and pass on the link juice to your own pages. Submitting a URL to SocialMonkee takes less than a few minutes, and it only takes a few seconds if you use the Firefox or Chrome Plugin (provided to you at no cost). The system even integrates popular content spinning and link indexing tools so you can submit URLs even faster and get the most out of your backlinks. What are you waiting for? SocialMonkee is powerful, fast, fun and beneficial! Don't miss out on this opportunity... Your competitors won't! https://bestchoiceseo.com/social-media To Your Success, Alex P.S. - If you already build backlinks but don't see the benefits, here is your chance to boost them and make them pass on some powerful link juice to your own pages. https://bestchoiceseo.com/social-media

Guest

Hello. Very interesting content but it's hard to find scotthemplinglaw.com in search results. You are out of google's top ten, so you can't expect big traffic. You need high quality backlinks to rank in serps. And you can get them for free, just search in google: fasrixo's tools Also visit my web-site: VaughnBig

Guest

Hello. Very interesting content but it's hard to find scotthemplinglaw.com in search results. You are out of google's top ten, so you can't expect big traffic. You need high quality backlinks to rank in serps. And you can get them for free, just search in google: fasrixo's tools Look at my page - VaughnBig

Guest

Hi, I was just visiting your website and thought I'd get in touch with you. I think if you are serious about making money with your Wordpress Websites by scoring high GOOGLE Ranking, you need this plugin, period. >>http://simpleseosolutions.xyz My buddy, Daniel has got #1 Ranking in Google for a keyword against 219 million competition! That's how powerful on-page SEO can be! http://simpleseosolutions.xyz I just did a search on Daniel and surprisingly, this guy is really a hidden gem. People buying his product is saying this: "Daniel, I did not read your sales letter, I just bought. Your past products have been so good, that I don't even need to know what you're offering." This is no joke. Listen, Daniel has always OVER-DELIVERED! I tested his customer support and it is REAL fast! So rest assured, you will get the best support from Daniel! >>http://simpleseosolutions.xyz (A video showing you what the plugin does)

Guest

Hi, I was checking out your site and thought I'd drop you a quick note on your site. My company helps a lot of sites just like you get visitors to your site quick. I'd urge you to check this out http://realtargetedtraffic.xyz I can visitors to your site fast for under $40 bucks http://realtargetedtraffic.xyz Thanks realtargetedtraffic.xyz

Post new comment